Lab 2 - Ohm's Law Comments about the lab reports --- About the graphs and slope etc. -- I. In any graph, you should always connnect the points by either a line or a curve depending on what you expect the graph to look like. II. To find the slope, always draw a line, choose two points ON THAT LINE, and find the slope. Never use just two data points ( unless they happen to fall exactly on the line ). III. Always show which points you've chosen to find the slope and show the calculations. IV. Using the V vs. I graphs for light bulb and resistor, you had to show which of the two is ohmic and which is non-ohmic. V. Comparison of the V vs I graphs and P vs I^2 graphs - Using the eqution V = (R)(I) , we see that the slope of V:I graph is R. Also, Using P = (R)(I^2), we can infer that the slope of P:I^2 graph is also R. Further, for a given resistor, they should look the same - because, if the resistor is ohmic, both V:I and P:I^2 graphs will have constant slope, while if it's non-ohmic, they'll both be similar looking curves. XIII. Some of you had a wrong scale on the x-axis for the P vs I^2 graph. ( Well, i can't explain what's meant by a wrong scale without a graph paper and as my computer familiarity is pretty limited, i can't include one in this document. So see me if you have further question. ) VI. You had to mention why you chose the points that you chose to to find the slope with. I expected you to see that the light bulb graph is a curve and it has two linear parts, one before it starts glowing and one after. If you find the slope in the part after it starts glowing, the value is vastly different from the value measured by the DMM. So, that should give you a hint that you should find the slope in the first part of the graph and compare that value with the DMM value. B2. This was bonus for mentioning the correct reason for the non-ohmic behaviour of the light-bulb. When the light bulb starts glowing, it's temperature rises and change in temperature changes the resistance. So you'll see that the slope before it starts glowing is nearly equal to the value found from DMM when the bulb was cold. About the calculations and verifying Kirchoff's laws -- VII. For both the circuits, you had to find the value of individual resistances for R1, R2, R3 and compare it with the one you measured with DMM. VIII. Calculating equivalent resistance correctly - For circuit 2, it was just the sum of R1, R2, R3. For circuit 3, 1/R = 1/R2 + 1/R3 gives the equivalent resistance of R2 and R3. Then, the total equivalent resistance is the sum of R1 and R. i.e. Req = R + R1. IX. The total resistance of the circuit as measured was Rt = Vps / Ips where Vps and Ips are voltage across and current through the power supply. X. You had to compare the Req (see VIII.) with the Rt(see IX.) XI. Whenever you compare two values, you must mention the % error ( or % discrepency or % difference or whatever else you might choose to call it,) because "5.2 is close to 5.6" is not very meaningful. XII. You had to show that the data DIRECTLY verifies the Kirchoff's laws. There were three main checks - 1. The sum of voltages in a loop should add up to zero, which means that for circuit 2, sum of voltages across R1, R2 and R3 should add up to voltage of the power supply. for circuit 3, Sum of voltages across R1 and R2 should add up to voltage of the power supply. 2. Since R2 and R3 and in parallel in circuit 3, the voltage law implies that the voltages across R2 and R3 should be same. 3. Using the current law, the current in R1 must be equal to the sum of currents through R2 and R3. ( for circuit 3).E-mail : apte@physics.utexas.edu